NEW FINDINGS WAYS BECOME CORONAVIRUS HOW TO

The first is the “common enemy” scenario, in which people begin to look past their differences when faced with a shared external threat. It might sound idealistic, but there are two reasons to think it can happen. The extraordinary shock(s) to our system that the coronavirus pandemic is bringing has the potential to break America out of the 50-plus year pattern of escalating political and cultural polarization we have been trapped in, and help us to change course toward greater national solidarity and functionality.

NEW FINDINGS WAYS BECOME CORONAVIRUS HOW TO

His next book, The Way Out: How to Overcome Toxic Polarization, will be released in 2021. Coleman is a professor of psychology at Columbia University who studies intractable conflict. Maybe the de-militarization of American patriotism and love of community will be one of the benefits to come out of this whole awful mess. Perhaps, too, we will finally start to understand patriotism more as cultivating the health and life of your community, rather than blowing up someone else’s community. We will give them guaranteed health benefits and corporate discounts, and build statues and have holidays for this new class of people who sacrifice their health and their lives for ours. When all is said and done, perhaps we will recognize their sacrifice as true patriotism, saluting our doctors and nurses, genuflecting and saying, “Thank you for your service,” as we now do for military veterans. Like Li Wenliang and the doctors of Wuhan, many are suddenly saddled with unfathomable tasks, compounded by an increased risk of contamination and death they never signed up for. Those on the frontlines against coronavirus aren’t conscripts, mercenaries or enlisted men they are our doctors, nurses, pharmacists, teachers, caregivers, store clerks, utility workers, small-business owners and employees. Mark Lawrence Schrad is an associate professor of political science and author of the forthcoming Smashing the Liquor Machine: A Global History of Prohibition.Īmerica has long equated patriotism with the armed forces. The paradox of online communication will be ratcheted up: It creates more distance, yes, but also more connection, as we communicate more often with people who are physically farther and farther away-and who feel safer to us because of that distance. Unfortunately, if unintendedly, those without easy access to broadband will be further disadvantaged. Instead of asking, “Is there a reason to do this online?” we’ll be asking, “Is there any good reason to do this in person?”-and might need to be reminded and convinced that there is. The comfort of being in the presence of others might be replaced by a greater comfort with absence, especially with those we don’t know intimately. It could become second nature to recoil from shaking hands or touching our faces-and we might all find we can’t stop washing our hands. How quickly that awareness recedes will be different for different people, but it can never vanish completely for anyone who lived through this year. We know now that touching things, being with other people and breathing the air in an enclosed space can be risky.

This loss of innocence, or complacency, is a new way of being-in-the-world that we can expect to change our doing-in-the-world. Now, the 1918 flu pandemic is a sudden specter in our lives.

The 2008 financial crisis told us we also can suffer the calamities of past eras, like the economic meltdown of the Great Depression. On 9/11, Americans discovered we are vulnerable to calamities we thought only happened in distant lands. Deborah Tannen is a professor of linguistics at Georgetown and author, most recently, of You’re the Only One I Can Tell: Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships.

New findings ways become coronavirus